<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clean Watershed Campaign &#187; Current Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/category/current-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org</link>
	<description>EMBRACING THE URGENCY OF NOW FOR OUR RIVERS, BAY AND NEIGHBORS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:00:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dioxin – A Serious Public Heath Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2010/09/03/dioxin-%e2%80%93-a-serious-public-heath-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2010/09/03/dioxin-%e2%80%93-a-serious-public-heath-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 03:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/?p=769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Dioxin &#8211; A Serious Public Health Risk&#8221; Stephen Lester, Science Director Center for Health, Environment &#038; Justice Many industry advocates have argued that dioxin is not a threat to public health and that the federal EPA’s proposed cleanup goals – interim preliminary remediation goals (PRGs) – for dioxin in soil are trying to solve a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2010/09/03/dioxin-%e2%80%93-a-serious-public-heath-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saturday morning truism</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2010/08/21/saturday-morning-truism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2010/08/21/saturday-morning-truism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mhr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/?p=757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In America today you can murder land for private profit. You can leave the corpse for all to see, and nobody calls the cops. ~Paul Brooks, The Pursuit of Wilderness, 1971]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2010/08/21/saturday-morning-truism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dream escaped</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/11/19/dream-escaped/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/11/19/dream-escaped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dream Escaped Kathy Henry When my husband and I bought our 3-acre Tittabawassee Riverfront property in 1984, we were thrilled. Waterfront property is scarce in Saginaw County, and we felt that we were one of the lucky ones. We could never have been so wrong. We did not learn for almost 2 decades after buying [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/11/19/dream-escaped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A housewife, a nurse and a history professor.</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/11/09/a-housewife-nurse-and-history-proffesor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/11/09/a-housewife-nurse-and-history-proffesor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mhr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deFur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lone Tree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/?p=318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EPA and Dow have negotiated &#8212; are you ready – an Administrative Order on Consent (AOC). This is the blueprint for a Tittabawassee and Saginaw rivers and bay cleanup, minus the method of cleanup AND the number to which Dow has to reduce its dioxin footprint, for example, Michigan’s 90 ppt (rather high) or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/11/09/a-housewife-nurse-and-history-proffesor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dow signs, again&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/18/dow-signs-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/18/dow-signs-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mhr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aoc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RCRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As anticipated, EPA announced Friday that Dow Chemical signed on the dotted line accepting the administrative order on consent (AOC) negotiated with the company behind closed doors over the summer. Contrary to some media reports this is not a cleanup plan. To coin EPA verbiage, “It does not contemplate cleanup”. This agreement only provides for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/18/dow-signs-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Not Now, When?</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/07/167/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/07/167/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mhr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In my experience, Dow only enters into negotiations if they can cut a better deal for themselves, not the environment.&#8221; Former EPA Region V Administrator, Mary Gade Greetings: After spending the summer negotiating behind closed doors Region V EPA recently announced an agreement has been reached with Dow Chemical. The plan should be released to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/07/167/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking a Stand for Our Land</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/07/157/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/07/157/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Taking a Stand for Our Land” Addressing Saginaw’s Environmental Health Inequalities Pamela L. (Pugh) Smith, MS, REHS In 1992, the US Environmental Protections Agency (EPA) reported that racial minorities and low-income people were disproportionately exposed to lead, selected air pollutants, hazardous waste facilities, contaminated fish, and agricultural pesticides in the workplace. The government has made [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/07/157/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Through a Mother&#8217;s Eyes</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/05/through-a-mothers-eyes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/05/through-a-mothers-eyes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 01:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MDEQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toxic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woodman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Through a Mother’s Eyes Marcia Woodman I heard about Dow’s dioxin contamination on the Tittabawassee River in early 2002. I live on the river and wondered what dioxin was. In the coming months the state warned us to wear masks and to avoid contact with soil and sediments in the river. I have three small [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/10/05/through-a-mothers-eyes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this corporate accountability?</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/09/21/on-corporate-good-will/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/09/21/on-corporate-good-will/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKenna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this corporate accountability?Brian McKenna, Ph.D. Dow Chemical is an unaccountable corporation. As is true for any corporation, profits, not people, are its fundamental concern. But Dow is in a league by itself in its ability to create a benign corporate image, even in the face of massive environmental health pollution, illness, death and civic distress. These effects [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/09/21/on-corporate-good-will/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should it take generations?</title>
		<link>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/09/21/should-it-take-generations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/09/21/should-it-take-generations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accountability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dempsey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should It Take Generations? Dave Dempsey The first time I heard of dioxins, and Dow Chemical’s relationship to them, was 1983. The President of the United States was first-term Ronald Reagan, Michael Jackson’s Thriller was about to become a big hit, and the Internet was yet to touch anyone’s life. And we’re not much farther [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cleanwatershedcampaign.org/2009/09/21/should-it-take-generations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
